| If
ignorance is bliss, critics are smiling
By KEN MIDKIFF
Published
Friday, April 18, 2008
(http://archive.columbiatribune.com/2008/apr/20080418comm002.asp)
Answering the
critics:
Unless those
representing agribusiness interests - Kristin Perry of the Missouri
Clean Water Commission and Charlie Kruse of the Missouri Farm Bureau
Federation - know something more recent than an April 2 EPA report,
they are whistling past the graveyard. While there is controversy
about how much is coming from each state in the Mississippi River
Basin (which includes the Missouri River and its valley), there
is no doubt that it is runoff from fertilizers containing nitrogen
and phosphorous that is the cause of the "Dead Zone" in
the Gulf of Mexico. Every federal agency that has examined this
issue has deemed that to be so.
I agree that
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers needs to conduct tests on the dirt
it dumps into the Missouri River. But it has done that and found
no contaminants. So why is Perry objecting so much, even to the
point of putting corps officials on the Clean Water Commission’s
carpet (with a large sign behind the commission denouncing the corps)?
Maybe she’s just grandstanding.
Perry and Kruse
might be right in asserting that agriculturists are using less fertilizer
than in previous years, but it is not the amount that is applied
to the land that is important; it is the amount that runs off. Now,
a number of federal types that are committed to reducing the size
of the Dead Zone are concerned that this coming year there might
be more nitrogen-based fertilizers applied than ever before. Corn,
they say, will be planted in plenitude due to increased prices for
that commodity. So, it could well be that federal subsidies for
corn and corn ethanol might make the hypoxia problem worse - not
to mention that corn ethanol could never make it in a free market.
I’m pointing
fingers at "farmers"? Well, no, but I am pointing fingers
at agribusiness companies, which Perry and Kruse support. Fertilizer
companies, backed up by bought-and-paid-for extension agents and
university agronomists, advise farmers to over-apply fertilizers,
much of which ends up in the Gulf of Mexico. It is interesting that
both critics cite the same information. Could it be that Perry and
the Farm Bureau are joined at the hip?
? A few people sent e-mails to my personal address taking me to
task for saying that this area’s economy is not dependent
on development that I alleged is ripping out the heart and soul
of this community.
I asserted that
the contrary was true. Do away with our amenities of green and open
space, and this is no longer a pleasant place to live. However,
for those not deterred by facts, consider:
- I do
not own or drive a pickup.
- I do
not live in a large house (two of us live in a 1,600-square-foot
residence).
- No
one needs to live in a cave.
- Most
people would agree that strip malls are ugly.
- Most
people find dirt and mud (where trees once grew) unsightly.
- Those
who don’t like development on the outskirts of town are
in the vast majority, as witnessed by recent elections and recent
votes of the Columbia City Council.
To those critics,
I say if ignorance is bliss, the lot of you must be extremely happy.
Regarding Earth
Hour, as I understand those who chided me for pointing out all those
bright lights at Memorial Stadium and Simmons Field, a track and
field meet is more important than showing solidarity with those
who care about the future of our existence on this planet. To be
fair, however, no one defended the University of Missouri keeping
classroom lights on all night.
I had driven
slowly around campus in the wee hours of the morning. A few MU policemen
viewed me with suspicion, and one followed me to make sure I was
not up to something illegal. What I observed was a lot of electric
lights - incandescent ones, not compact fluorescents.
The MU power
plant was pumping out the kilowatts - burning coal, sending tons
of carbon dioxide into the upper atmosphere. For what? Nothing,
as far as I could tell. |